ReviewNeuro-oncology2025
Molecular-based decision-making in glioblastoma surgery: When to aim for supramaximal resection.
Review in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-derived surgical samples reveal the cellular and molecular signatures of glioblastoma infiltration in distinct radiological zones.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Neurosurgical Application of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Understanding the difference in symptoms and outcomes between glioblastoma patients diagnosed based on histological or molecular criteria: a retrospective cohort analysis from the Histo-Mol GBM collaborative.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- The specific linear or curved boundaries between WHO grade II-III insular gliomas and the basal ganglia indicate distinct biological features, survival outcomes, and surgical strategies: evidence from 330 cases.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advent of molecular techniques has enhanced our understanding of the biology of malignancies over the past decade. Multi-omics has facilitated an in-depth characterization of glioblastomas at the cellular level, revealing intricate details about tumor cell states and their compositions. This advancement has substantially enriched our comprehension of tumor cell interactions with the surrounding microenvironment-such as neurons and immune cells-shedding light on patterns of tumor growth, infiltration, and therapeutic resistance. Despite the introduction of immunotherapies and molecularly guided chemotherapeutic treatments, surgical resection remains a cornerstone of the glioblastoma therapeutic regimen. While maximal resection is universally considered to improve patient outcomes, integrating molecular data and insights into tumor cell interactions suggests a role for molecular-based surgical decision-making. Herein, we review how the molecular characterization of glioblastoma subtypes and their interactions can predict the benefits of surgical resection. We discuss how these insights could refine neurosurgical management in the future. Integrating multi-omics-preferably in real-time during surgery-promises to guide patient selection and optimize neurosurgical decision-making. Although these developments are promising for enhancing surgical strategies and improving patient outcomes, further validation in prospective studies involving larger cohorts and the development of workflows for clinical practice is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.