ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2025
Differential motor neuron activity in rats during successful and failed grasping.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A substantial body of literature has focused on neural signals evoked by errors emerging during the execution of goal-directed actions. It is still unclear how motor cortex activity during movement execution relates to feedback error processing. To investigate this, we recorded primary motor cortex (M1) single-unit activity in rats during a grasping task. About half of the recorded neurons showed modulation of their firing activity that did not depend on success or failure, which we termed outcome-independent neurons. Other neurons showed a difference in their discharge profile when comparing successful and unsuccessful trials, which we called outcome-dependent neurons. Among both outcome-dependent and -independent neurons, we further distinguished neurons presenting their maximum firing rate in specific epochs as defined by the task. We compared the cortical distribution of outcome-independent and outcome-dependent neurons to cortical maps of complex forelimb movements evoked by intracortical microstimulation in additional animals. The majority of outcome-independent neurons was localized within the limb extension and paw open-closure movement representations. Outcome-dependent neurons were not clearly associated to particular motor representations. Cortical arrangement of neurons, both outcome-independent and outcome-dependent, and their correlation with distinct movement representations, can serve as indicator for anticipating potential outcomes before the conclusion of an action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.