Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40036964›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Evaluating changes in attractor sets under small network perturbations to infer reliable microbial interaction networks from abundance patterns.

Jyoti Jyoti, Marc-Thorsten Hütt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jyoti JyotiSchool of Science, Constructor University, Bremen 28759, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6654-7971
Marc-Thorsten HüttSchool of Science, Constructor University, Bremen 28759, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationInferring microbial interaction networks from microbiome data is a core task of computational ecology. An avenue of research to create reliable inference methods is based on a stylized view of microbiome data, starting from the assumption that the presences and absences of microbiomes, rather than the quantitative abundances, are informative about the underlying interaction network. With this starting point, inference algorithms can be based on the notion of attractors (asymptotic states) in Boolean networks. Boolean network framework offers a computationally efficient method to tackle this problem. However, often existing algorithms operating under a Boolean network assumption, fail to provide networks that can reproduce the complete set of initial attractors (abundance patterns). Therefore, there is a need for network inference algorithms capable of reproducing the initial stable states of the system.

resultsWe study the change of attractors in Boolean threshold dynamics on signed undirected graphs under small changes in network architecture and show, how to leverage these relationships to enhance network inference algorithms. As an illustration of this algorithmic approach, we analyse microbial abundance patterns from stool samples of humans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with colorectal cancer and from healthy individuals to study differences between the interaction networks of the three conditions. The method reveals strong diversity in IBD interaction networks. The networks are first partially deduced by an earlier inference method called ESABO, then we apply the new algorithm developed here, EDAME, to this result to generate a network that comes nearest to satisfying the original attractors. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Implementation code is freely available at https://github.com/Jojo6297/edame.git.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMicrobial InteractionsMicrobiotaAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID40036964
PMCPMC11961200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.