ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026
Impact of interventions to prevent asbestos-related respiratory disease in an exposed worker registry using a simplified G-computation.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- European Code Against Cancer, 5th edition - occupational exposures and cancer.Molecular oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Ontario Asbestos Workers Registry is a regulatory exposure registry obligating employers to report the number of work hours with asbestos-containing materials for each of their workers. Currently, each worker is notified of the need for a medical examination once they have accrued 2000 reported hours of work with asbestos. We sought to evaluate the impact on disease prevention of alternative policies limiting asbestos work hours among registry participants. A cohort of 26 164 asbestos workers were followed for cancer and nonmalignant disease diagnoses between 1986 and 2019. Analyses of the association between cumulative asbestos work hours and respiratory disease incidence rates showed substantially elevated disease rates well before reaching 2000 asbestos work hours. Using a simplified application of parametric G-computation (G-POSH), limiting cumulative asbestos work hours to 100 h would have prevented 76 asbestosis, 36 pulmonary fibrosis, 27 mesothelioma, and 79 lung cancer cases at the end of follow-up compared to the observed risk in the cohort. Limiting exposure to 2000 asbestos work hours had a smaller but still substantial impact on disease prevention, particularly among workers in the construction industry. Regulatory agencies should intervene sooner to prevent respiratory disease among workers in the registry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.