Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40036806›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2025

Impact of the presence of sinus rhythm during cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for atrial flutter on the incidence of future new-onset atrial fibrillation: insights from an international multi-centre registry.

Josip Katic, Patrick Badertscher, Ivan Zeljkovic, Peter Ammann, Tobias Reichlin, Sven Knecht, Philipp Krisai, Michael Kühne, Christian Sticherling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Josip KaticDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4059 Basel, Switzerland.
Patrick BadertscherDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4059 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9751-0557
Ivan ZeljkovicDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-4550-4056
Peter AmmannDepartment of Cardiology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2410-9807
Tobias ReichlinDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7197-8415
Sven KnechtDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4059 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7122-021X
Philipp KrisaiDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4059 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4367-2363
Michael KühneDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4059 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2937-3711
Christian SticherlingDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4059 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8428-7050

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AblationAtrial fibrillationCavotricuspid isthmusOral anticoagulationRadiofrequencyTypical atrial flutter

Identifiers

PMID40036806
PMCPMC11983383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.