Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40036791›Full record

ArticleNurse educator

Using Large Language Models to Analyze Factors Influencing Academic Supervision Relationships in Qualitative Interviews With Postgraduate Nursing Students.

Yanxue Xu, Hongxia Xie, Yingchun Zeng, Junhong Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nurse educator. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yanxue XuAuthor Affiliations: School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China (Ms Xu and Dr Zhu); School of Computers and Computing Sciences, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, China (Ms Xie); and Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (Dr Zeng).
Hongxia Xie
Yingchun Zeng
Junhong Zhu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNursing postgraduate supervisors serve as educators, mentors, and research facilitators, ensuring the holistic development of postgraduate students to meet the evolving demands of nursing care. PURPOSE: This study explored factors influencing academic supervision relationships (playing a critical role in the academic and professional development of students). It innovatively applied 2 large language models (LLMs) to analyze qualitative interviews with postgraduate nursing students.

methodsData were collected through semi-structured interviews with 14 nursing graduate students, and 2 LLMs widely used in China were used for interview transcript analysis.

resultsThe themes extracted by 2 LLM models were highly consistent and can be grouped into 4 main categories: (1) academic supervisor-related factors: supervisory style, personal traits, leadership style, and research capabilities/resources; (2) student-related factors: independence, initiative, and career expectations; (3) academic supervisor-student interaction: communication frequency and quality and shared goals; and (4) environmental factors: academic environment and team culture.

conclusionActive communication, clear role expectations, and cooperation optimize supervisory relationships, enhancing nursing training and research.

Indexed as

Education, Nursing, GraduateFaculty, NursingInterprofessional RelationsLanguageMentorsStudents, NursingAdultChinaCommunicationFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLarge Language ModelsLeadershipMaleNursing Education Researchlarge language modelsqualitative interviewsupervisory relationshipuse of LLM for qualitative data analysis

Identifiers

PMID40036791
PMCPMC12594151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.