Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40036752›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2025

Exploring health literacy development through co-design: understanding the expectations for health literacy mediators.

Madeline Spencer, Vaughan Cruickshank, Nenagh Kemp, Rosie Nash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Madeline SpencerSchool of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9440-6885
Vaughan CruickshankSchool of Education, College of Arts, Law and Education, University of Tasmania, Newnham Drive, Newnham, Tasmania 7001, Australia.
Nenagh KempSchool of Psychological Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Grosvenor Street, Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7001, Australia.
Rosie NashSchool of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.

Funding

College of Health and Medicine OP.057420University of Tasmania
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health promotion efforts that enhance health literacy among individuals, organizations, and communities are gaining attention globally. Additionally, co-designed and community-led health promotion interventions have gained recognition as an effective strategy for addressing health issues through more effective and sustainable health outcomes. This qualitative study conducted in Tasmania, Australia, aimed to co-design the emerging Health Literacy Mediator (HLM) and to assess the support, expectations, and need for such a role. Following an Ophelia approach, data for this research were collected via focus group discussions within an online workshop, enabling diverse perspectives to emerge and be analysed via thematic analysis. Discussions around how the role could impact the individuals and families presented in the short case scenarios (vignettes) produced four strong expectations: that they are solution-focused, that they have a duty to facilitate change, that the role is based in community, and that the role targets those in the community who need them most to ensure the greatest impact. Participants also shared other recommendations and supporting ideas for the role. The potential role of HLM holds substantial promise in addressing health inequities for all individuals, regardless of background or socioeconomic status, by optimizing time management, simplifying navigation, ensuring the right care, and building community trust. By creating connections and advocating for individuals, HLMs could effectively break down barriers to healthcare access. This proactive approach not only addresses immediate health concerns but could also lay the groundwork for sustained improvements in public health outcomes in the future.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyHealth PromotionAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleQualitative ResearchTasmaniaco-designhealth inequityhealth literacyhealth literacy mediatorsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID40036752
PMCPMC11879027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.