ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
scMitoMut for calling mitochondrial lineage-related mutations in single cells.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innate immune imprints shape HIV-1 reservoir cell persistence during long-term antiretroviral therapy.Nature immunology · 2026Article
- Reconstruction of Cell Diversity and Cell Lineages from Somatic Mutations in Single-Cell Transcriptomic Data.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026Article
- Charting single-cell lineages with synthetic and natural barcodes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- The Use of Single-Cell Mitochondrial DNA SNP Combinations for Distinguishing Organ-Specific Cell Types.Cells · 2026Article
- MitoDelta: identifying mitochondrial DNA deletions at cell-type resolution from single-cell RNA sequencing data.BMC genomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tracing cell lineages has become a valuable tool for studying biological processes. Among the available tools for human data, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has a high potential due to its ability to be used in conjunction with single-cell chromatin accessibility data, giving access to the cell phenotype. Nonetheless, the existing mutation calling tools are ill-equipped to deal with the polyploid nature of the mtDNA and lack a robust statistical framework. Here we introduce scMitoMut, an innovative R package that leverages statistical methodologies to accurately identify mitochondrial lineage-related mutations at the single-cell level. scMitoMut assigns a mutation quality q-value based on beta-binomial distribution to each mutation at each locus within individual cells, ensuring higher sensitivity and precision of lineage-related mutation calling in comparison to current methodologies. We tested scMitoMut using single-cell DNA sequencing, single-cell transposase-accessible chromatin (scATAC) sequencing, and 10× Genomics single-cell multiome datasets. Using a single-cell DNA sequencing dataset from a mixed population of cell lines, scMitoMut demonstrated superior sensitivity in identifying a small proportion of cancer cell line compared to existing methods. In a human colorectal cancer scATAC dataset, scMitoMut identified more mutations than state-of-the-art methods. Applied to 10× Genomics multiome datasets, scMitoMut effectively measured the lineage distance in cells from blood or brain tissues. Thus, the scMitoMut is a freely available, and well-engineered toolkit (https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/html/scMitoMut.html) for mtDNA mutation calling with high memory and computational efficiency. Consequently, it will significantly advance the application of single-cell sequencing, facilitating the precise delineation of mitochondrial mutations for lineage-tracing purposes in development, tumour, and stem cell biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.