Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40036713›Full record

ArticleNeurology2025

Investigating Whether Dissemination in Time Is Essential to Diagnose Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.

Wallace J Brownlee, Michael A Foster, Giuseppe Pontillo, Indran Davagnanam, Sara Collorone, Ferran Prados, Baris Kanber, Frederik Barkhof, Alan J Thompson, Ahmed T Toosy and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wallace J BrownleeQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0481-8902
Michael A FosterQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7201-7475
Giuseppe PontilloQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5425-1890
Indran DavagnanamDepartment of Brain Repair & Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0363-1911
Sara ColloroneQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1506-8983
Ferran PradosQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7872-0142
Baris KanberQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2443-8800
Frederik BarkhofQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3543-3706
Alan J ThompsonQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4333-8496
Ahmed T ToosyQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4441-3750
Olga CiccarelliQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7485-1367

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) requires evidence of both dissemination in space (DIS) and time (DIT); oligoclonal bands (OCBs) in the CSF can substitute for DIT on MRI. We investigated whether DIT (or positive CSF) is necessary to make a diagnosis of MS in patients who fulfil a high number of DIS criteria.

methodsWe prospectively recruited patients with a first demyelinating event evaluated with brain and spinal cord MRI within 3 months of onset. The patients were followed up clinically and with MRI. We retrospectively applied DIS criteria requiring lesions in ≥2/4, ≥3/4, or 4/4 regions typically affected in MS (periventricular, cortical/juxtacortical, infratentorial, spinal cord) and ≥2/5, ≥3/5, ≥4/5, and 5/5 regions (including the optic nerve) to baseline assessments. We investigated the performance of each set of DIS criteria for a diagnosis of MS using the 2017 McDonald criteria, requiring both DIS (lesions in ≥2/4 regions) plus DIT on MRI (gadolinium-enhancing and nonenhancing lesions, new T2 lesions at follow-up) or CSF-specific OCBs, as the gold standard.

resultsWe included 244 patients (mean age 32.5 years, 154 [63%] female); 187 (77%) patients were diagnosed with MS using the 2017 McDonald criteria over a mean follow-up of 11.2 years. DIS alone, requiring lesions in ≥2/4, ≥3/4, or 4/4 regions, exhibited reducing sensitivity (84%, 58%, and 26%, respectively) and increasing specificity (91%, 98%, 100%) for an MS diagnosis. In 112 (46%) patients with optic nerve assessment with orbital MRI or visual evoked potentials, DIS in ≥2/5, ≥3/5, ≥4/5, or 5/5 regions also resulted in reducing sensitivity (96%, 83%, 61%, 30%) and increasing specificity (44%, 83%, 100%, 100%) for MS diagnosis. We propose a diagnostic algorithm for MS in patients with a first demyelinating event based on the number of DIS regions fulfilled. DISCUSSION: In patients with a first demyelinating event, DIS in ≥4 regions typically affected in MS is highly specific, indicating an extremely low risk of false-positive results, and misdiagnosis. Using DIS in ≥4 regions would reduce the need for follow-up MRI or CSF examination in all patients with suspected MS, streamlining the diagnostic process. Limitations include an over-representation of patients with optic neuritis at onset, a low rate of CSF examination, and lack of optical coherence tomography data.

Indexed as

Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingOligoclonal BandsAdultBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSpinal CordTime FactorsYoung AdultOligoclonal Bands

Identifiers

PMID40036713
PMCPMC11886981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.