ArticleNeurology2025
Investigating Whether Dissemination in Time Is Essential to Diagnose Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.
Article in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictors of Multiple Sclerosis After Clinically Isolated Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.European journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Application of the 2024 McDonald Criteria: Earlier Diagnosis and Avoiding Misdiagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis in a Global Setting.Neurology · 2026Review
- Performance of the 2024 McDonald Criteria in Patients Under Evaluation for Suspected Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology · 2026Article
- Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Diagnosis and Its Differentiation from Neurological Mimics, MS and ALS: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A paradigm shift away from dissemination in time in multiple sclerosis.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic performance of the 2010, 2017, and 2024 McDonald criteria: clinical implications in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) requires evidence of both dissemination in space (DIS) and time (DIT); oligoclonal bands (OCBs) in the CSF can substitute for DIT on MRI. We investigated whether DIT (or positive CSF) is necessary to make a diagnosis of MS in patients who fulfil a high number of DIS criteria.
methodsWe prospectively recruited patients with a first demyelinating event evaluated with brain and spinal cord MRI within 3 months of onset. The patients were followed up clinically and with MRI. We retrospectively applied DIS criteria requiring lesions in ≥2/4, ≥3/4, or 4/4 regions typically affected in MS (periventricular, cortical/juxtacortical, infratentorial, spinal cord) and ≥2/5, ≥3/5, ≥4/5, and 5/5 regions (including the optic nerve) to baseline assessments. We investigated the performance of each set of DIS criteria for a diagnosis of MS using the 2017 McDonald criteria, requiring both DIS (lesions in ≥2/4 regions) plus DIT on MRI (gadolinium-enhancing and nonenhancing lesions, new T2 lesions at follow-up) or CSF-specific OCBs, as the gold standard.
resultsWe included 244 patients (mean age 32.5 years, 154 [63%] female); 187 (77%) patients were diagnosed with MS using the 2017 McDonald criteria over a mean follow-up of 11.2 years. DIS alone, requiring lesions in ≥2/4, ≥3/4, or 4/4 regions, exhibited reducing sensitivity (84%, 58%, and 26%, respectively) and increasing specificity (91%, 98%, 100%) for an MS diagnosis. In 112 (46%) patients with optic nerve assessment with orbital MRI or visual evoked potentials, DIS in ≥2/5, ≥3/5, ≥4/5, or 5/5 regions also resulted in reducing sensitivity (96%, 83%, 61%, 30%) and increasing specificity (44%, 83%, 100%, 100%) for MS diagnosis. We propose a diagnostic algorithm for MS in patients with a first demyelinating event based on the number of DIS regions fulfilled. DISCUSSION: In patients with a first demyelinating event, DIS in ≥4 regions typically affected in MS is highly specific, indicating an extremely low risk of false-positive results, and misdiagnosis. Using DIS in ≥4 regions would reduce the need for follow-up MRI or CSF examination in all patients with suspected MS, streamlining the diagnostic process. Limitations include an over-representation of patients with optic neuritis at onset, a low rate of CSF examination, and lack of optical coherence tomography data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.