Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40036688›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2025

How many doses and what type of antibiotic should be used as systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in primary hip and knee arthroplasty? A register-based study on 301,204 primary total and hemi- hip and total knee arthroplasties in Norway 2005-2023.

Olav Lutro, Marianne Bollestad Tjørhom, Tesfaye Hordofa Leta, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Geir Hallan, Trond Bruun, Marianne Westberg, Tina Strømdal Wik, Christian Thomas Pollmann, Stein Håkon Lygre and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Olav LutroDepartment of Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway. olav.lutro@sus.no.ORCID 0000-0003-3312-3712
Marianne Bollestad TjørhomDepartment of Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8612-7728
Tesfaye Hordofa LetaThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Faculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University, Bergen, Norway.
Jan-Erik GjertsenThe Norwegian Hip Fracture Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8490-268X
Geir HallanThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Trond BruunDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen; Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Marianne WestbergDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Tina Strømdal WikDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7317-5475
Christian Thomas PollmannDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3869-0129
Stein Håkon LygreThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Department of Occupational Health, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Ove FurnesThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8223-2515
Lars EngesæterThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3126-3164
Håvard DaleThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2962-2706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeGuidelines for systemic antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) in arthroplasty surgery vary worldwide from repeated doses to only 1 preoperatively. We aimed to investigate, primarily whether 4 doses reduced the risk of PJI compared with 1 to 3 doses, and secondarily if there was a difference between types of antibiotics.

methodsPatients reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register with primary total knee (TKA), total (THA) or hemi- (HA) hip arthroplasty between 2005 and 2023 were included. Cases with 1 to 4 doses of cefalotin (half-life = 45 minutes), cefazolin (90 minutes), cefuroxime (70 minutes), cloxacillin (30 minutes), or clindamycin (180 minutes) were assessed. Primary outcome was 1-year risk of reoperation (adjusted hazard rate ratio; aHRR) for PJI and was estimated by Cox regression analyses. Secondary outcomes were reoperation for PJI and reoperation for any cause with follow-up of up to 19 years. Non-inferiority analyses and propensity score matching with subsequent Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed with a predetermined non-inferiority margin of 15% (aHRR = 1.15).

results301,204 cases were included. Of these, 3,388 (1.1%) were reoperated on for PJI within 1 year. The 1-year incidence of reoperation for PJI was 98/9,760 (1.0%) for 1 dose of SAP, 109/10,956 (0.9%) for 2 doses, 178/18,948 (0.9 %) for 3 doses, and 3,003/261,540 (1.0%) for 4 doses. The 1-year risk (aHRR, 95% confidence interval [CI]) of reoperation for PJI was 1.0 (CI 0.8-1.2), 0.9 (CI 0.8-1.2), and 0.9 (CI 0.9-1.1) for 1, 2, and 3 doses, respectively, compared with 4 doses. The 1-year incidence of reoperation for PJI was 2,162/183,964 (1.2%) for cefalotin, 993/91,159 (1.1%) for cefazolin, 35/4,435 (0.8%) for cefuroxime, 85/9,022 (0.9%) for cloxacillin, and 113/12,624 (0.9%) for clindamycin. Compared with cefazolin, cloxacillin (1.2, CI 1.0-1.6) and cefalotin (1.4, CI 1.2-1.5) had a higher risk of reoperation for PJI, whereas cefuroxime (1.0, CI 0.7-1.4) and clindamycin (1.1, CI 0.9-1.3) had a similar risk.

conclusion4 doses of SAP did not reduce the risk of PJI compared with 1 to 3 doses in primary arthroplasty as measured against PJI. Cefazolin, the 1st-generation cephalosporin with the longest half-life, showed the lowest risk of PJI.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeProsthesis-Related InfectionsAgedAged, 80 and overCefazolinCefuroximeClindamycinFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayRegistriesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefazolinCefuroximeClindamycin

Identifiers

PMID40036688
PMCPMC11881024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.