Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40036670›Full record

ArticleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2025

Separate and combined effects of operant ABA renewal mitigation strategies.

Carlos Henrique Santos Silva, Valdeep Saini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reducing renewal with context fading during differential reinforcement procedures.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026
    Article
  4. Separate and combined effects of operant ABA renewal mitigation strategies.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carlos Henrique Santos SilvaBrock University, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8985-2610
Valdeep SainiBrock University, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4616-6677

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the undesirable effects of operant renewal for behavioral interventions, recent research has advocated for the advancement of renewal mitigation strategies. One strategy includes the use of extinction cues, which are stimuli used to establish discriminative control over responding in the second context that are subsequently transferred to the initial context. A second strategy involves context fading, which refers to progressively increasing the similarity between the second context and the initial context. The current study evaluated the separate and combined effects of these techniques using a preclinical human laboratory arrangement. Participants were exposed to the extinction cue strategy, the context fading strategy, both strategies, or neither strategy during a three-phase ABA renewal procedure using differential reinforcement of an alternative response combined with extinction. The results indicated that context fading or combining context fading with an extinction cue was effective at mitigating renewal. The use of an extinction cue alone reduced renewal relative to the control group, but this difference was not statistically significant. The results are discussed in terms of methodological and theoretical differences across strategies as well as implications for future research on renewal mitigation strategies.

Indexed as

Conditioning, OperantExtinction, PsychologicalAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleReinforcement, PsychologyYoung Adultcontextcontext fadingextinction cuehumanrelapserenewal

Identifiers

PMID40036670
PMCPMC11954422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.