ArticleJMIRx med2025
Predicting Escalation of Care for Childhood Pneumonia Using Machine Learning: Retrospective Analysis and Model Development.
Article in JMIRx med, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07279675 (Clinical Predictors of Severity in Pediatric Community-Acquired Pneumonia at Assiut University Children's Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Predictors of Severity in Pediatric Community-Acquired Pneumonia at Assiut University Children's Hospital
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of hospitalisation in young children with pneumonia in Malawi: A machine learning-based approach.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- A leakage-controlled and SHAP driven machine learning framework for paediatric respiratory disease classification using Indian hospital EHR data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning for the early differentiation of pediatric bronchopneumonia using routine laboratory parameters.PloS one · 2026Article
- Machine learning prediction of oxygen therapy in pediatric Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pneumonia is a leading cause of mortality in children aged <5 years. While machine learning (ML) has been applied to pneumonia diagnostics, few studies have focused on predicting the need for escalation of care in pediatric cases. This study aims to develop an ML-based clinical decision support tool for predicting the need for escalation of care in community-acquired pneumonia cases. Objective: The primary objective was to develop a robust predictive tool to help primary care physicians determine where and how a case should be managed. Methods: Data from 437 children with community-acquired pneumonia, collected before the COVID-19 pandemic, were retrospectively analyzed. Pediatricians encoded key clinical features from unstructured medical records based on Integrated Management of Childhood Illness guidelines. After preprocessing with Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique-Tomek to handle imbalanced data, feature selection was performed using Shapley additive explanations values. The model was optimized through hyperparameter tuning and ensembling. The primary outcome was the level of care severity, defined as the need for referral to a tertiary care unit for intensive care or respiratory support. Results: A total of 437 cases were analyzed, and the optimized models predicted the need for transfer to a higher level of care with an accuracy of 77% to 88%, achieving an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.88 and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.96. Shapley additive explanations value analysis identified hypoxia, respiratory distress, age, weight-for-age z score, and complaint duration as the most important clinical predictors independent of laboratory diagnostics. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of applying ML techniques to create a prognostic care decision tool for childhood pneumonia. It provides early identification of cases requiring escalation of care by combining foundational clinical skills with data science methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.