ArticleNucleic acids research2025
A detailed analysis of second and third-generation sequencing approaches for accurate length determination of short tandem repeats and homopolymers.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Genomics for Resistome Characterization: Current Advancements and Future Challenges Under a One Health Perspective.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Near-Telomere-to-Telomere Genome Assembly of the Spotted Seal (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Novel African American Colorectal CancerHuman mutation · 2026Article
- Inherent instability of simple DNA repeats shapes an evolutionarily stable distribution of repeat lengths.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Comprehensive benchmarking of somatic single-nucleotide variant and indel detection at ultra-low allele fractions using short- and long-read data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The evolutionary dynamics of organellar pan-genomes in Arabidopsis thaliana.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Flipping the switch on some of the slowest mutating genomes: Direct measurements of plant mitochondrial and plastid mutation rates in msh1 mutants.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Get ready for short tandem repeats analysis using long reads-the challenges and the state of the art.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microsatellites are short tandem repeats (STRs) of a motif of 1-6 nucleotides that are ubiquitous in almost all genomes and widely used in many biomedical applications. However, despite the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) over the past two decades with new technologies coming to the market, accurately sequencing and genotyping STRs, particularly homopolymers, remain very challenging today due to several technical limitations. This leads in many cases to erroneous allele calls and difficulty in correctly identifying the genuine allele distribution in a sample. Here, we assessed several second and third-generation sequencing approaches in their capability to correctly determine the length of microsatellites using plasmids containing A/T homopolymers, AC/TG or AT/TA dinucleotide STRs of variable length. Standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-free and PCR-containing, single Unique Molecular Indentifier (UMI) and dual UMI 'duplex sequencing' protocols were evaluated using Illumina short-read sequencing, and two PCR-free protocols using PacBio and Oxford Nanopore Technologies long-read sequencing. Several bioinformatics algorithms were developed to correctly identify microsatellite alleles from sequencing data, including four and two modes for generating standard and combined consensus alleles, respectively. We provided a detailed analysis and comparison of these approaches and made several recommendations for the accurate determination of microsatellite allele length.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.