ReviewJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026
A perspective on individualized treatment effects estimation from time-series health data.
Review in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validating medical digital twins for clinical decision support: beyond predictive accuracy.JAMIA open · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe objective of this study is to provide an overview of the current landscape of individualized treatment effects (ITE) estimation, specifically focusing on methodologies proposed for time-series electronic health records (EHRs). We aim to identify gaps in the literature, discuss challenges, and propose future research directions to advance the field of personalized medicine. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature review to identify and analyze relevant works on ITE estimation for time-series data. The review focused on theoretical assumptions, types of treatment settings, and computational frameworks employed in the existing literature.
resultsThe literature reveals a growing body of work on ITE estimation for tabular data, while methodologies specific to time-series EHRs are limited. We summarize and discuss the latest advancements, including the types of models proposed, the theoretical foundations, and the computational approaches used. DISCUSSION: The limitations and challenges of current ITE estimation methods for time-series data are discussed, including the lack of standardized evaluation metrics and the need for more diverse and representative datasets. We also highlight considerations and potential biases that may arise in personalized treatment effect estimation.
conclusionThis work provides a comprehensive overview of ITE estimation for time-series EHR data, offering insights into the current state of the field and identifying future research directions. By addressing the limitations and challenges, we hope to encourage further exploration and innovation in this exciting and under-studied area of personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.