ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2025
Expanding Geroscience to Vulnerable Populations in Mid-Late Life: Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Service Users and Formerly Incarcerated Individuals.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A wide range of geroscience-guided interventions, or gerotherapeutics, including repurposed drugs, natural products, and lifestyle changes are now being tested in small-scale proof-of-concept studies. If successful, these efforts may help maintain or restore function across numerous health-related domains, thus extending human healthspan. To date, little attention has been paid to exploring the potential of gerotherapeutics to improve healthspan-related outcomes in vulnerable populations that have accumulated experiences detrimental to health in adulthood and later life. We contend that 2 vulnerable populations that have been especially overlooked are mid-late life adults receiving Medicaid-funded home- and community-based services (HCBS), and previously incarcerated individuals. Published data on Medicaid HCBS users show ample evidence of racial, ethnic, and health-related heterogeneity, with opportunities for gerotherapeutics to stop or slow the progression of disability. Previously incarcerated individuals show evidence of accelerated biological aging, leading to geriatric conditions and hospitalizations greater than among matched counterparts not experiencing incarceration. We present ethical, equity, and clinical trial design considerations relevant to these vulnerable populations, including the possibility of implementing codesign procedures that might make gerotherapeutic interventions more attractive to individuals in these populations. We also discuss advocacy and service-related networks that could be tapped to help enhance the recruitment of these vulnerable populations into gerotherapeutic clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.