ArticlePloS one2025
Multisensory stimuli facilitate low-level perceptual learning on a difficult global motion task in virtual reality.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Running virtual reality experiments online: A brief introduction and tutorial.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study investigates the feasibility of inducing visual perceptual learning on a peripheral, global direction discrimination and integration task in virtual reality, and tests whether audio-visual multisensory training induces faster or greater visual learning than unisensory visual training. Seventeen participants completed a 10-day training experiment wherein they repeatedly performed a 4-alternative, combined visual global-motion and direction discrimination task at 10° azimuth/elevation in a virtual environment. A visual-only group of 8 participants was trained using a unimodal visual stimulus. An audio-visual group of 9 participants underwent training whereby the visual stimulus was always paired with a pulsed, white-noise auditory cue that simulated auditory motion in a direction consistent with the horizontal component of the visual motion stimulus. Our results reveal that, for both groups, learning occurred and transferred to untrained locations. For the AV group, there was an additional performance benefit to training from the AV cue to horizontal motion. This benefit extended into the unisensory post-test, where the auditory cue was removed. However, this benefit did not generalize spatially to previously untrained areas. This spatial specificity suggests that AV learning may have occurred at a lower level in the visual pathways, compared to visual-only learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.