ArticlePloS one2025
Dental radiography and safety awareness: Insights from radiographers, dentists, and students in a cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of centring rings and an educational intervention on intraoral radiographic quality among dental students.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Evaluating radiation safety knowledge and practices in dental professionals: findings from a cross-sectional survey.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Correction: Dental radiography and safety awareness: Insights from radiographers, dentists, and students in a cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDental radiographs are crucial diagnostic tools for oral disorders, but their low-level radiation can pose health risks over time because of its cumulative effects.
objectivesThis study aimed to assess awareness and attitudes regarding dental radiography and safety among dentists, radiographers, dentistry students, and radiography students in western Saudi Arabia.
methodsThis cross-sectional survey study was conducted in the western region of Saudi Arabia. A total of 309 participants were included in the study. A questionnaire containing 13 multiple-choice questions was administered to dentists, radiographers, dentistry students, and radiography students. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 23) was used for data analysis.
resultsThe mean knowledge and attitude scores of the participants were 61.09% and 65.13%, respectively. The mean score knowledge of dentists was 6.8 out of 12, that of radiographers was 7.04 out of 12, that of radiography students was 6.42 out of 12, and that of dentistry students was 6.83 out of 12. The attitude score was 35.45 out of 55, for dentists; 36.21 out of 55, for radiographers; 36.54 out of 55, for radiography students; and 34.79 out of 55, for dentistry students. The knowledge score increased significantly in participants who had Ph.D. and M.Sc. degrees (p value = 0.008). There was no significant variation in knowledge regarding gender, age, area of employment, or experience (p value < .05). The participants exhibited a positive attitude toward dental radiographic examination and radiation safety, with no significant difference observed among the groups (p value > .05).
conclusionThis study indicates good awareness among dentists, radiographers, and students about dental radiography and safety, with higher education levels indicating greater awareness and a positive attitude. The safety and knowledge of dental radiography exposure vary among groups, highlighting the need for continuous education and standardized training to improve the understanding and usage of radiation hazards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.