Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40036170›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025

Adoption of Decentralized Trial Elements in Cancer Clinical Trials Supporting FDA Approvals during COVID-19.

Timil H Patel, Amy Corneli, Pamela Balcazar, Craig Lipset, Sara B Calvert, Sabrena Mervin-Blake, Vinit Nalawade, Paul G Kluetz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Timil H PatelOffice of Oncologic Diseases, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-2875-7761
Amy CorneliDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-4629-4329
Pamela BalcazarOncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0009-0002-9910-1540
Craig LipsetDecentrialized Trials and Research Alliance, San Diego, California.ORCID 0000-0002-7766-6340
Sara B CalvertClinical Trials Transformation Initiative, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-4229-2729
Sabrena Mervin-BlakeClinical Trials Transformation Initiative, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-6293-0885
Vinit NalawadeDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-6594-6740
Paul G KluetzOffice of Oncologic Diseases, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-9796-4791

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted cancer clinical trials, prompting sponsors to adopt decentralized clinical trial (DCT) elements to ensure patient safety and trial continuity. Supported by FDA emergency guidance, the FDA Oncology Center of Excellence, in collaboration with the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, conducted an assessment of DCT elements in cancer trials leading to FDA approval during the pandemic. Between December 6, 2022, and January 17, 2023, the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative collected survey data from trial sponsors about DCT elements used in response to the pandemic, implementation challenges, and anticipated future use. Of 52 eligible trials, 19 responses were received from 13 sponsors, predominantly large pharmaceutical companies. The majority of trials (89%) included both U.S. and international sites, and nearly all sponsors (95%) adopted at least one DCT element during the pandemic. Key DCT elements included remote site monitoring (89%), telemedicine (68%), remote laboratory assessments (63%), and remote distribution of investigational products (58%). Main challenges encountered included institutional policies (83%), technology adoption (61%), and regulatory restrictions (56%). Despite challenges, sponsors showed strong intent to continue DCT use, especially for remote monitoring, patient-reported outcomes collection, and telemedicine. This study demonstrates the viability of DCT elements for generating FDA-approvable data, suggesting potential for expanded trial access and reduced patient burden. Continued attention to site-level challenges is needed to sustain DCT adoption in cancer clinical trials.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCOVID-19NeoplasmsHumansSARS-CoV-2United StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID40036170
PMCPMC12081193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.