ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2025
Development & evaluation of a training programme to address complex post-COVID psychological needs.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & objectives In India, mental health treatment gaps are significant, and related to shortage of trained personnel. Published literature has identified gaps in existing training programmes including - delivering psychological interventions for complex concerns such as intensified post-COVID grief, trauma, suicidality; ongoing mentoring; and culture-sensitive interventions. Despite government initiatives, gaps in treatment and training have been compounded by a surge in psychological distress following COVID-19. This study aimed to develop, implement and evaluate a training programme for psychologists to identify, assess, and treat complex post-COVID psychological concerns. Methods The study employed a sequential mixed exploratory research design with tailored programme development (Phase I) and programme delivery with pre-post evaluations of participation, satisfaction, learning and competence using Moore's framework (Phase II). Psychologists with postgraduate qualifications, engaged in direct client contact were invited through flyers to participate in the free online training programme. Results The final programme included ten modules; with knowledge, skills, and application components; comprising synchronous and asynchronous elements. Fifty-three participants enrolled in the programme and 70 per cent completed the course. Pre-post evaluations indicated high satisfaction (93.54% rated as met/exceeded expectations); improvements in competence (pre training mode = 3; post-training mode = 4); and average to above average learning scores (mean scores ≥3 on 7 out of 9 module quizzes). Participant feedback revealed that the focus on complex concerns, practical learning through interactive sessions and role play recordings, and case-based supervision were helpful. Interpretation & conclusions The programme focused on training gaps identified through a needs assessment survey. It was received well in terms of participation, satisfaction, content, accessibility and learning. The indigenous and skill-focused training has implications to contribute to future mental health preparedness and scope for large-scale deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.