Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40036057›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2025

NCI-Funded Cancer Epidemiology Survivor Cohorts: Overview, Progress, and Opportunities.

Lisa Gallicchio, Andrea N Burnett-Hartman, Kelly K Filipski, Nonniekaye Shelburne, Andrew N Freedman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2025.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa GallicchioClinical and Translational Epidemiology Branch, Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-7080-0140
Andrea N Burnett-HartmanClinical and Translational Epidemiology Branch, Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-4009-0680
Kelly K FilipskiClinical and Translational Epidemiology Branch, Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-8523-9162
Nonniekaye ShelburneClinical and Translational Epidemiology Branch, Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-6886-8373
Andrew N FreedmanClinical and Translational Epidemiology Branch, Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-1451-4208

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999National Cancer Institute (NCI)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe goal of this article was to provide an overview of the current NCI-funded large cancer epidemiology survivor cohorts (CESC).

methodsLarge CESCs were defined as observational cohort studies following at least 1,000 cancer survivors over time and collecting data on survivorship outcomes. CESCs with NCI grant funding on June 1, 2024 were identified in two ways: (i) by identifying grants funded under cancer epidemiology cohort-relevant Notice of Funding Opportunities and (ii) by applying the Research, Condition, and Disease Categorization-indexed concepts related to cohorts to the entire NCI grant portfolio in the NIH's proprietary Query, View, Reporting System and reviewing grants identified via this search for inclusion.

resultsThirty active grants supporting large CESCs were identified. Of the 30 CESCs, 36.7% are comprised of survivors of mixed cancer types; the remaining 63.3% are following survivors diagnosed with cancer of a single anatomic type or grouping (e.g., blood cancers). Special populations of focus include adult survivors of pediatric cancers, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors, pediatric cancer survivors, and stem cell transplant survivors. Notable gaps include cohorts following long-term cancer survivors, survivors of less common cancer types, and survivors from understudied populations.

conclusionsCESCs highlighted in this article represent a substantial investment in exploring the multifaceted factors that influence cancer outcomes. These cohorts encompass an increasing diversity of cancer types, treatments, and populations. IMPACT: CESCs provide valuable insights into clinical and molecular risk factors associated with cancer survivorship outcomes that inform guidelines and interventions.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsCohort StudiesHumansNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)United States

Identifiers

PMID40036057
PMCPMC12048225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.