Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40036037›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Co-Occurrence of Stunting and Off-Track Early Child Development in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Joshua Jeong, Hyejun Chi, Lilia Bliznashka, Helen O Pitchik, Rockli Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua JeongHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Hyejun ChiInterdisciplinary Program in Precision Public Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School of Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Lilia BliznashkaInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
Helen O PitchikDivision of Epidemiology, University of California Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley.
Rockli KimInterdisciplinary Program in Precision Public Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School of Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Evaluating multicomponent interventions to optimize health and development for children and adolescents living in povertyK99HD114882 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI PITCHIK, HELEN OSBORNE · 2024 to 2025
$236k
NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD114882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although children across low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are increasingly surviving, many are not fully thriving. Both stunting and off-track early child development (ECD) hinder children's potential to thrive. Objectives: To estimate the global prevalence of the co-occurrence of stunting and off-track ECD and explore its association with nurturing care and sociodemographic factors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study pooled data from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (2010-2020) on 173 416 children aged 36-59 months in 41 LMICs. Statistical analysis was conducted from February to December 2024. Exposure: Risk factors pertaining to inadequate nurturing care, low socioeconomic status, and other sociodemographic characteristics. Main Outcomes and Measures: Children were classified into 4 groups with respect to thriving: children who were stunted only (height-for-age z score <-2 SD), off-track ECD only (measured using the Early Childhood Development Index), both stunted and off-track ECD (co-occurrence), or neither. Results: In the pooled sample of 173 416 children, the mean (SD) child age was 47.1 (6.8) months, and 88 242 (50.9%) were boys. Approximately 1 in 6 children (17.0% [95% CI, 16.8%-17.2%]) were both stunted and had off-track ECD, 17.1% (95% CI, 16.9%-17.3%) were stunted only, 27.8% (95% CI, 27.6%-28.0%) had off-track ECD only, and 38.1% (95% CI, 37.9%-38.4%) were neither stunted nor had off-track ECD. Socioeconomic gradients were observed, with more co-occurrence in lower-income countries (18.2% [95% CI, 17.9%-18.6%]), poorer households (22.1% [95% CI, 21.7%-22.5%] for poorest wealth quintile), mothers with lower educational levels (20.8% [95% CI, 20.6%-21.0%] for primary education or less), and rural settings (19.3% [95% CI, 19.1%-19.6%]). Various indicators of inadequate nurturing care along with low socioeconomic status were associated with co-occurrence. The top 5 factors associated with co-occurrence were poorest wealth quintile (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.75; 95% CI, 2.53-2.99), no early childhood education (AOR, 2.22; 95% CI, 2.10-2.34), low maternal educational level (AOR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.37-1.51), no toys at home (AOR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.35-1.51), and diarrhea (AOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.31-1.45). The associations of poor household wealth, no birth registration, and no early childhood education with co-occurrence were significantly larger than their associations with stunting only or off-track ECD only. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study of young children in LMICs suggests that a significant proportion were both stunted and had off-track ECD. These findings underscore the need for multisectoral interventions that holistically target nutrition, health, and ECD risks to ensure that all children globally can thrive, especially those facing the double burden of stunting and off-track ECD.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentDeveloping CountriesGrowth DisordersChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID40036037
PMCPMC11880945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.