ArticleJournal of applied genetics2026
Pivotal role of biallelic frequency analysis in identifying copy number alterations using genome-wide methods in tumors with a high level of aneuploidy.
Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The copy-number events in skull base chordoma stratify tumours into four biologically coherent groups.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- High level of aneuploidy and recurrent loss of chromosome 11 as relevant features of somatotroph pituitary tumors.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromosome number abnormalities is one of the hallmarks of cancer. DNA copy number alterations (CNA) are studied using various genome-wide methods. In our study, we investigated CNA in human pituitary tumors using three platforms CytoSNP-850 K microarrays, low-pass whole-genome sequencing (average × 7 coverage, LPWGS), and Infinium Methylation EPIC array. Virtual karyotypes based on each dataset were generated using open-source software packages for each sample. Concordant CNA profiles were found for most of tumor. Surprisingly, substantial discrepancies between results from SNP arrays and LPWGS/EPIC arrays were identified in 20% of tumors, for which discrimination of true karyotype was required. B-allelic frequency data from SNP arrays was crucial to adjust normal ploidy level as ultimately verified with FISH. The discrepancy between virtual karyotypes was more pronounced the more CNAs were found. When CNAs covered around half of genome, the level of normal/diploid copy number was incorrectly set with methods, based solely on signal intensity/read-counts coverage. To conclude, CNA analyses with methods such as LPWGS and methylation arrays in highly aneuploid tumors are prone to a bias from improper normal ploidy level setting. These methods are commonly used therefore, we aimed to aware the scientific community about this underestimated methodological problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40036001What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.