SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025
A comprehensive review and meta-analysis comparing robot-assisted and 3D laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Cancer medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Operative safety and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced middle-upper gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer using Weigao versus da Vinci systems: a retrospective comparative study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Predictive Factors for Infectious Complications after Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric or Esophagogastric Junction Cancer.European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes · 2026Observational
- Robotic Gastrointestinal Surgery Compared to Conventional Approaches: An Umbrella Review of Clinical and Economic Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review and meta-analysis evaluates the short-term surgical results of robot-assisted gastrectomy compared to 3D laparoscopic gastrectomy in individuals with gastric cancer. This study used scholarly articles from peer-reviewed articles of PubMed. Further, this study uses other sources, such as, Embase, CNKI, and the Cochrane Library, to gather relevant studies on gastrectomy for gastric cancer which are made public from the inception of these databases up to July 15, 2024. This study seeks to primarily draw similarities between the therapeutic efficacy of robot-assisted gastrectomy (RG) and the 3D laparoscopic gastrectomy (3D-LG). Similarly, this study will strictly adhere to the inclusion and exclusion guidelines, focusing on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort research. A total of 1231 gastric cancer patients were involved in incorporating seven retrospective cohort studies as the final analysis in the study with 533 undergoing robot-assisted gastrectomy and 698 undergoing 3D-LG. The results showed that patients who received robotic-assisted gastrectomy experienced superior outcomes regarding EBL and time-to-first postoperative exhaust compared to those who underwent 3D-LG. However, the robotic-assisted approach was related to a reduced number of LNY. Besides, there were similarities between the two surgical techniques in relation to OT, LOHS, and post-surgery complications. In summary, robot-assisted gastrectomy is acknowledged as a secure and efficient treatment option for individuals with stomach cancer. This approach demonstrated notable benefits compared to 3D-LG, particularly with regard to estimated intraoperative blood loss and the timing of the first postoperative exhaust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40035959What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.