ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
Presentation and outcomes of surgery for choledochal cyst in children and adults: an experience of 329 cases.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An explainable machine learning model for predicting postoperative cholangitis in pediatric surgical patients with pancreaticobiliary maljunction.BioData mining · 2025Article
- Forme Fruste Choledochal Cysts in Children: Clinical Presentation and Treatment Outcomes-A Retrospective Multicenter Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to report our experience in patients with choledochal cyst (CDC) and to evaluate whether there is any difference in the clinical presentation, cyst -related complications, and long-term biliary outcomes after surgery among children and adults. All the patients who underwent CDC excision between January 2008 and December 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: children (< 18 years) and adults (≥ 18 years). There were 329 patients with CDC excision (77.5% were female, adult/children = 251/78). Abdominal pain was the predominant presenting symptom in both groups. Abdominal lump (10.3% vs 3.2%; p = 0.011) and the triad of CDC (9% vs 2.4%; p = 0.009) were more common in children. But, the preoperative biliary intervention (37.8% vs 15.4%; p = < 0.001), previous biliary surgery (32.7% vs 3.8%; p = < 0.001), and prevalence of gallstones (36.7% vs 3.8%; p = < 0.001), cystolithiasis (56.6% vs 38.5%; p = 0.005), and intrahepatic stones (7.6% vs 1.3%; p = 0.054) were more common in adults. Most patients were presented with type I CDC (71.4%). Extrahepatic bile duct excision with Roux en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed in all the patients. Although overall postoperative complications were comparable between adults and children (31.1% vs 26.9%; p = 0.485), wound infection was more common in adults (19.9% vs 6.4%; p = 0.005) and bile leak was more common in children (12.8% vs 5.2%; p = 0.021). There was no operative mortality. Over a mean follow-up of 59 (40) months, 2 patients (0.78%) developed malignancy. Excellent or good Long-term biliary outcome was significantly better in children than adults (98.1% vs 90.5%; p = 0.010). Independent predictors for unsatisfactory biliary outcomes were type IVA cysts, postoperative bile leak, adult patients, and longer duration of follow-up. In conclusion, presentation and cyst-related complications differ between adults and children. Surgery offers excellent results in the vast majority of patients. Long-term biliary complications were more in adults. Long-term follow-up is recommended for the possibility of future development of hepato-biliary-pancreatic malignancy and delayed biliary complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40035920What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.