ArticleOecologia2025
Infection intensity and severity of Ranavirus transmission in juvenile wood frogs.
Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Complex effects of sex reversal on reproductive success in wild frogs.Science advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ranaviruses are responsible for mass die offs of wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) tadpoles. What happens in between epidemics is less clear, but juvenile (metamorphosed) stages are hypothesized to move Ranaviruses among wetlands and introduce or reintroduce these viruses into wetlands, initiating new outbreaks. A key question is under what circumstances can juvenile L. sylvaticus infect susceptible conspecifics. We examined Ranavirus transmission between juvenile L. sylvaticus in two settings: first, we measured transmission from a Ranavirus-infected frog to a co-housed susceptible frog via cohabitation over a range of exposure periods. Second, we measured indirect transmission to susceptible frogs from a contaminated environment after a range of waiting times (i.e., from when the infected frog was removed to when the susceptible frog was exposed to the environment). We present evidence that juvenile frogs directly transmitted Ranavirus to susceptible frogs in all exposure periods (99.2% infected), with as little as 1 h of co-housing resulting in 95.8% of susceptibles infected. Indirectly, 96.8% of susceptible frogs became infected after as long as 48 h waiting times. Neither exposure period nor wait times influenced the probability of infection, because these probabilities are already high. In our linear regression models, susceptible frog viral load was significantly correlated with exposure period and cohort for the cohabitation experiment, while wait time was significantly correlated with viral load for the sequential habitation experiment. Collectively, our results suggest that Ranavirus transmission readily occurs between recently metamorphosed wood frogs and via terrestrial environmental exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.