Observational studyJournal of neurology2025
Deep characterization of females with heterozygous Duchenne muscular dystrophy mutations.
Observational study in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From inactivation to intervention: X chromosome silencing in disease pathogenesis and emerging therapeutic strategies.Genes & diseases · 2026Review
- Characterization of Dystrophin-Related Syndromes: Carriers, DMD, and BMD.Muscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Genetic cardiomyopathy unmasked by pregnancy: X-linked dystrophinopathy presenting as peripartum cardiomyopathy-a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- Natural history of cardiac involvement in women carrying pathogenic DMD gene variants: a 7-year longitudinal study.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Cardiac MRI in cardiac dystrophinopathy: recommendations on imaging.Open heart · 2026Review
- Spectrum and carrier frequency of DMD in Yueyang, China: a population-based analysis using NGS and MLPA.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDuchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked muscular dystrophy due to null mutations in the DMD gene that predominantly affects males, while heterozygous females are usually asymptomatic carriers. In approximately 10-20% of cases, they may present with muscle weakness and/or cardiomyopathy. We aimed to describe clinical and molecular characteristics of DMD heterozygous females.
methodsA monocentric, observational, and cross-sectional study was designed. Clinical and molecular data were collected along with, when available, muscle biopsies. The pattern of X inactivation was determined in peripheral blood and the genotypes at SPP1, LTBP4 and CD40 modifier genes were established.
resultsWe recruited 47 participants: 27 (57%) were asymptomatic and 20 (43%) manifested symptoms. Proximal muscles were prominently involved, as in male dystrophinopathies. Twenty % of carriers showed cardiac involvement. Creatine kinase (CK) values were in the normal range in ~ 20% of symptomatic and ~ 46% asymptomatic patients. In all muscle biopsies, a mosaic of dystrophin positive and negative fibers was observed that only marginally correlated to dystrophin amount. No correlation was found between X chromosome inactivation pattern and the severity of muscular involvement, nor any association with cardiomyopathy. No genotype-phenotype correlations were identified.
interpretationGenotype/phenotype correlations in females heterozygous for DMD mutations are influenced by multiple mechanisms, of which better understanding will be crucial for future dystrophin gene replacement therapies. An earlier molecular identification is essential to lead to greater awareness of the potential cardiac complications, and hence the reinforcement of appropriate cardiac follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.