ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2025
A structured framework for emotion-cognition dynamics: Implications for assessment and intervention.
Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Teaching Experience Correlates with Enhanced Social Cognition in Preschool Teachers.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- Feeling seen matters: how organization-based self-esteem mediates the relationship between university students' coping resources and thriving in Germany, Indonesia, and the United Arab Emirates.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a novel framework for understanding the interaction between cognitive and emotional processes, recognizing the complex and dynamic relationship between these two constructs. The framework categorizes cognitive functions into four distinct categories: Cold Cognition, Hot Cognition, Warm Cognition, and Cool Cognition. By distinguishing between the style of processing (intuitive vs. analytical) and the content of information (emotional vs. non-emotional), the framework provides a model for both assessment and intervention. For assessment, it helps categorize cognitive and emotional processes, enabling targeted evaluations based on specific processing styles and content. For interventions, it supports the development of training programs that address processing styles in relation to the target function, improving the effectiveness of therapeutic and developmental strategies. Overall, this framework has the potential to advance both theoretical understanding and practical applications in cognitive and emotional assessment and training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40035829What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.