Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40035812›Full record

ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2025

Antiplatelet therapy in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Angela Dettling, Kurt Huber, Steen D Kristensen, Daniel Aradi, Benedikt Schrage, Peter Clemmensen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angela DettlingDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. a.dettling@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0992-0236
Kurt HuberFaculty of Medicine, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria.
Steen D KristensenDepartment of Cardiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Daniel AradiHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Benedikt SchrageDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Peter ClemmensenDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary revascularization represents a cornerstone in the treatment of infarct-related cardiogenic shock (CS). Early and effective antithrombotic therapy is critical and has been shown to improve mortality in most patients with acute coronary syndrome. Achieving early effective platelet inhibition and anticoagulation, with minimal risk, is particularly important in those high-risk patients with CS as the mortality remains high at approximately 50%. However, patients with CS are at high risk for both early thrombotic as well as bleeding events and striking the right balance remains a challenge due to a multitude of factors related to drug administration, metabolism and mechanical issues related to therapeutic interventions such as increasing use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS). This review therefore aims to provide an overview of the current practice, the underlying challenges and existing evidence on safety, efficacy and outcomes of adjunctive antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by CS and discusses the use of parenteral platelet inhibitors.

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsShock, CardiogenicHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAcute myocardial infarctionAntithrombotic therapyCardiogenic shockDual antiplatelet therapyMechanical circulatory support

Identifiers

PMID40035812
PMCPMC12460538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.