ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
Enhancing trace DNA recovery from disposable face masks: insights from the COVID-19 era and beyond.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trace DNA plays a pivotal role in forensic investigations, serving as a critical tool for linking suspects to criminal activities. During the COVID-19 pandemic, disposable face masks emerged as key items of forensic interest, particularly in cases where suspects used them to conceal their identities. This study evaluates the efficiency of two trace DNA collection methodologies-cotton swabbing and tapelifting-for recovering DNA from face masks. Samples were collected from 50 masks worn by suspects in robbery cases, utilizing the Copan cotton swab (150 C) and the SceneSafe Fast™ minitape (K545). Statistical analysis revealed that minitapes (MT) significantly outperformed cotton swabs (CS), yielding higher DNA concentrations (mean MT: 0.41 ng/µL, CS: 0.17 ng/µL; p < 0.05) and recovering more complete DNA profiles, including full single (FS) and full mixed (FM) profiles (p < 0.05). These findings highlight the superior efficiency of MT, particularly for recovering trace DNA from small or fabric-like surfaces. The study underscores the importance of selecting optimal collection methods in forensic investigations, especially for modern evidence types such as face masks. Recommendations include the routine adoption of minitapes in casework involving face masks and further research into their efficacy on other mask types and under varied environmental conditions. This research offers valuable insights to refine trace DNA recovery strategies, enhancing the reliability of forensic evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40035806What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.