ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Contextual Binocular Imbalance Impairs Local Stereopsis.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Breaking and restoring ocular balance: Temporal interactions in binocular rivalry and stereopsis.Journal of vision · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Binocular imbalance is known to inhibit stereopsis. This study investigates whether an imbalanced context around stereo stimuli also affects local stereopsis and explores the underlying mechanisms. Methods: Three experiments were conducted with normally sighted participants. Experiment 1 measured local stereo detection thresholds under three context conditions: binocular balance (0.5 vs. 0.5 contrast), left-eye dominance (0.8 vs. 0.2 contrast), and right-eye dominance (0.2 vs. 0.8 contrast). Experiment 2 assessed the modulation of the imbalance effect by context-target collinearity. Experiment 3 examined the imbalance effect with binocular fusion and rivalry context stimuli. Results: In experiment 1, the average stereo threshold was 62.4 arcsec in the binocular balance condition, elevated to 111.4 arcsec in the left-eye dominance (P = 0.003), and 114.7 arcsec in the right-eye dominance (P < 0.001), with no significant difference between the two imbalance conditions (P = 0.650). Experiment 2 showed that context-target collinearity modulated the imbalance effect, resulting in a smaller threshold elevation in the non-collinear condition (P = 0.011). Experiment 3 revealed significant main effects of imbalance (P = 0.031) and rivalry (P = 0.004), with no significant interaction (P = 0.966). Conclusions: Contextual binocular imbalance inhibits local stereopsis, an effect modulated by collinearity and similarly observed in both binocular integrative and suppressive contexts. These findings suggest that lateral connectivity in the primary visual cortex (V1) plays a fundamental role in stereopsis generation, offering novel approaches for clinical interventions aimed at restoring binocular balance and stereopsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.