SynthesisInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2025
Intrawound vancomycin powder for prevention of surgical site infections in primary joint arthroplasty: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Synthesis in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Only a partial shield: local vancomycin postpones but does not prevent hip and knee prosthetic infections.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Prevention and Treatment of Surgical Site Infections in Orthopaedic Surgery: An Italian Delphi Consensus on Risk Stratification and Wound Irrigation Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Comments on "Intrawound vancomycin powder for prevention of surgical site infections in primary joint arthroplasty: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses".International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Commentary on: Intrawound vancomycin powder for prevention of surgical site infections in primary joint arthroplasty an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this umbrella review is to explore the effect of intrawound vancomycin on the incidence of infection and wound complications in patients undergoing primary joint arthroplasty.
methodsTwo authors conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 15 October 2023. All systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining the effect of intrawound vancomycin on the incidence of infection and wound complications in primary joint arthroplasty were included. Two authors independently screened and extracted the data from the studies, evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews scale, and assessed the publication bias and small-sample effects.
resultsOur umbrella review includes a total of five systematic reviews, comprising 16 retrospective studies. The pooled results indicate that intrawound vancomycin significantly reduces overall infection rates [odds ratio (OR): 0.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30-0.54, P < 0.001], superficial infections (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26-0.97, P = 0.04), and periprosthetic joint infection rates (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.28-0.52, P < 0.001) among patients undergoing primary joint arthroplasty. However, vancomycin did not increase the risk of aseptic wound complications (OR: 1.34; 95% CI: 0.88-2.04, P = 0.17) and prolong wound healing (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 0.87-2.26, P = 0.17).
conclusionsBased on the available research, our umbrella review demonstrates that intrawound vancomycin significantly reduces infection rates in primary joint arthroplasty, including periprosthetic joint and superficial infections, without increasing wound complications. However, given the inclusion of studies with varying quality, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further high-quality studies are needed to better confirm its long-term safety, cost-effectiveness, and overall clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.