ReviewThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy2025
Understanding degenerative cervical myelopathy in musculoskeletal practice.
Review in The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality and reliability of cervical spondylotic myelopathy-related content on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- Performance of referral strategies for patients with suspected axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic review with meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic and Surgical Decision-Making for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Survey With Post-Stratification Analysis.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- A population-based survey of beliefs about neck pain and its associated disorders: a cross-sectional study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Subclinical knee extensor weakness predicts gait and balance impairment in degenerative cervical myelopathy.GeroScience · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDegenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a clinical syndrome characterized by a progressive compression of the spinal cord. DCM often looks like common symptoms of aging or bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome in its early stages, requiring careful differential diagnosis. Identifying DCM is a real challenge as no validated screening tools are available for making the DCM diagnosis. Potentially, individuals with DCM may experience misdiagnosis or substantial diagnostic delays, with an enhanced risk of irreversible neurological consequences if not promptly addressed. Despite the increasing prevalence, there is a lack of awareness about DCM among both the public and healthcare professionals. However, patients may seek physiotherapy to obtain a diagnosis or access treatment.
methodsA comprehensive (non-systematic) review of the literature about DCM epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, and management was conducted.
resultsA guide and essential knowledge to facilitate clinicians to understand DCM and to enhance clinical reasoning skills, performance and interpretation of the examination are provided. Interdisciplinary collaboration and optimal referral methods are also handled.
conclusionThe aim of this article is to summarize and enhance physiotherapists' essential knowledge of the differential diagnosis and management of patients with DCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.