ArticleThe Prostate2025
The Prognostic Value of the Prostate Adenocarcinoma With Ductal Feature in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated With Abiraterone Acetate.
Article in The Prostate, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe prognostic value of the prostate adenocarcinoma (PAC) with ductal feature in patients with advanced prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate has not been scrutinized. This study aims to explore the predictive value of PAC with ductal feature on the therapeutic efficacy of abiraterone therapy in metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 569 patients with mPCa receiving abiraterone at either the metastatic hormone-sensitive (mHSPC, N = 165) or castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC, N = 404) stage. PSM was performed to balance the baseline characteristics between individuals with and without ductal features. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to analyze the predictive significance of ductal feature on abiraterone efficacy, including PSA response, PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and overall survival (OS).
resultsTotally, ductal feature was detected in 40/569 (7.0%) men, with 18 and 22 in the mHSPC and mCRPC cohorts, respectively. The PSA response rate was comparable for people with and without ductal features for both cohorts. Notably, in the mHSPC cohort, patients with and without ductal features shared similar median PSA-PFS (not reached vs. 32.6-months, p = 0.593) and rPFS (not reached vs. 35.0-months, p = 0.768). Similar results were observed in the mCRPC cohort (median PSA-PFS: 21.2- vs. 11.6-months, p = 0.100; median rPFS: 34.6- vs. 18.7-months, p = 0.092). COX regression further revealed that ductal feature was not an indicator of unfavorable PSA-PFS or rPFS in the mHSPC and mCRPC cohort.
conclusionIn conclusion, our findings indicated that there is insufficient evidence to differentiate the therapeutic efficacy of AA in mPCa based on the presence or absence of ductal features. However, further validation through larger-scale studies is required to substantiate them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.