ArticleIUBMB life2025
The cGAS-STING-related signature affects the prognosis of colorectal cancer through its regulation of multiple immune cells.
Article in IUBMB life, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The cGAS-STING pathway: mechanistic basis, dual biological functions and translational therapeutic advances.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Review
- Nanoparticle delivery of Chinese medicine monomers for remodeling the colorectal cancer immune microenvironment.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Targeting the cGAS-STING Pathway in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Modulating Tumor-associated Inflammation for Therapeutic Effect.Current drug targets · 2026Review
- The cGAS-STING-related signature affects the prognosis of colorectal cancer through its regulation of multiple immune cells.IUBMB life · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cGAS-STING signaling pathway has emerged as a critical player in the immune response against cancer, including colorectal adenocarcinoma (COAD). Understanding the impact of this pathway on COAD at multiple omics levels is crucial for advancing cancer immunotherapy and precision medicine. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between cGAS-STING-related genes and COAD, analyzing gene mutations, copy number variations, DNA methylation, and gene expression to uncover the pathway's influence on COAD prognosis. Utilizing multi-omics sequencing data from TCGA and GEO databases, key core genes in the cGAS-STING pathway were identified and further validated through PCR and Western blot analysis. Mutations and copy number variations in the CASP8 and RIPK1 genes, differential DNA methylation patterns, and mRNA expression levels of specific genes were assessed to determine their impact on COAD prognosis. Validation through tissue samples highlighted NLRC3, CASP1, AIM2, and CXCL10 as core genes in the cGAS-STING pathway. Our findings demonstrate that mutations and copy number variations in CASP8 and RIPK1, differential DNA methylation patterns, and altered gene expression levels significantly influence the prognosis of COAD. The identification of core genes in the cGAS-STING pathway, particularly NLRC3, CASP1, AIM2, and CXCL10, has led to the development of a prognostic model predicting poor tumor outcomes through immune cell infiltration. This study provides valuable insights into the mechanisms of the cGAS-STING pathway in COAD and offers potential directions for future research in cancer immunotherapy and precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.