Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40035365›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2025

The Reciprocal Relationship Between Short- and Long-Term Motor Learning and Neurometabolites.

Melina Hehl, Shanti Van Malderen, Svitlana Blashchuk, Stefan Sunaert, Richard A E Edden, Stephan P Swinnen, Koen Cuypers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Motor cortex rTMS modulates adult ocular dominance plasticity.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Melina HehlMovement Control & Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3013-4427
Shanti Van MalderenMovement Control & Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.
Svitlana BlashchukNeuroplasticity and Movement Control Research Group, Rehabilitation Research Institute (REVAL), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Stefan SunaertDepartment of Imaging and Pathology, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Richard A E EddenRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Stephan P SwinnenMovement Control & Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.
Koen CuypersMovement Control & Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 11F6921NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 11L9322NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek EOS 30446199Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G039821NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G089818NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek I005018NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek R-3987KU Leuven C16/15/070KU Leuven PDMT2/24/077Universiteit Hasselt BOF21INCENT15Universiteit Hasselt BOF24DOC13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skill acquisition requires practice to stimulate neuroplasticity. Changes in inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmitters, such as gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate, are believed to play a crucial role in promoting neuroplasticity. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) at 3 T, using the MEGA-PRESS sequence, and behavioral data were collected from 62 volunteers. Participants completed a 4-week protocol, practicing either complex (n = 32) or simple (n = 30) bimanual tracking tasks (BTT). Neurotransmitter levels and skill levels at baseline, after 2 and 4 weeks of motor training were compared for the left and right primary sensorimotor cortex (SM1) and the left dorsal premotor cortex (PMd). Furthermore, task-related modulations of neurotransmitter levels in the left PMd were assessed. The study yielded that baseline neurotransmitter levels in motor-related brain regions predicted training success. Furthermore, lower GABA+ (p = 0.0347) and higher Glx (glutamate + glutamine compound) levels (p = 0.0234) in left PMd correlated with better long-term learning of simple and complex tasks, respectively, whereas higher GABA+ in right SM1 correlated with complex task learning (p = 0.0064). Resting neurometabolite levels changed during the intervention: Left SM1 Glx decreased with complex training toward Week 4 (p = 0.0135), whereas right SM1 Glx was increased at Week 2 (p = 0.0043), regardless of training type. Group-level analysis showed no task-related neurometabolite modulation in the left PMd. However, individual baseline GABA+ and Glx modulation influenced short-term motor learning (interaction: p = 0.0213). These findings underscore the importance of an interplay between inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmitters during motor learning and suggest potential for future personalized approaches to optimize motor learning.

Indexed as

gamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamic AcidLearningMotor CortexMotor SkillsSensorimotor CortexAdultFemaleGlutamineHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleNeuronal PlasticityYoung Adultgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamic AcidGlutaminebimanualfunctional magnetic resonance spectroscopy (fMRS)GABAGlxMEGA‐PRESSmotor learning

Identifiers

PMID40035365
PMCPMC11877351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.