Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40035351›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2025

Inferring Species Interactions From Co-occurrence Networks With Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Data in a Coastal Marine Food Web.

Elizabeth Boyse, Kevin P Robinson, Ian M Carr, Elena Valsecchi, Maria Beger, Simon J Goodman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth BoyseSchool of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4328-5320
Kevin P RobinsonCeteacean Research and Rescue Unit, Banff, Aberdeenshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8085-9752
Ian M CarrLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9544-1068
Elena ValsecchiDepartment of Environmental and Earth Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3869-6413
Maria BegerSchool of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1363-3571
Simon J GoodmanSchool of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4118-8575

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A good understanding of biotic interactions is necessary to accurately predict the vulnerability of ecosystems to climate change. Recently, co-occurrence networks built from environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding data have arisen as a tool to explore interspecific interactions in ecological communities exposed to different human and environmental pressures. Such networks can identify environmentally driven relationships in microbial and eukaryotic communities, but whether inferred co-occurrences robustly represent biotic interactions remains unclear. Here, we tackle this challenge and compare spatio-temporal variability in the structure and complexity of inferred co-occurrence networks and food webs, using 60 eDNA samples covering vertebrates and other eukaryotes in a North Sea coastal ecosystem. We compare topological characteristics and identify highly connected species across spatial and temporal subsets to evaluate variance in community composition and structure. We find consistent trends in topological characteristics across eDNA-derived co-occurrence networks and food webs that support some ability for the co-occurrence networks to detect real ecological processes, despite trophic interactions forming a minority of significant co-occurrences. The lack of significant trophic interactions detected in co-occurrence networks may result from ecological complexities, such as generalist predators having flexible interactions or behavioural partitioning, the inability to distinguish age class with eDNA or co-occurrences being driven by non-trophic or abiotic interactions. We find support for using eDNA-derived co-occurrence networks to infer ecological interactions, but further work is needed to assess their power to reliably detect and differentiate different interaction types and overcome methodological limitations, such as species detection uncertainties, which could influence inferred ecosystem complexity.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, EnvironmentalFood ChainAnimalsAquatic OrganismsEcosystemNorth SeaDNA, Environmentalcetaceancommunity ecologyco‐occurrence networksenvironmental DNAfood websspecies interactionstrophic interactions

Identifiers

PMID40035351
PMCPMC11934085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.