ArticleMolecular ecology2025
Inferring Species Interactions From Co-occurrence Networks With Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Data in a Coastal Marine Food Web.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomonitoring 3.0: Beyond Taxa Lists to Evidence-Tiered Monitoring of Ecosystem Dynamics and Interactions.Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Precipitation Modulates the Impact of Human Activities on Riverine Food Webs Revealed by Environmental DNA.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- The Seasonal Dietary Shift and Niche Resilience of Yaks on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Environmental Factors, Not Biotic Competitive Interactions, Drive the Relative Abundance of Diatoms and Chlorophyta in the Coastal Areas of the Beibu Gulf: Evidence From 18S rDNA Metabarcoding and Partial Least Squares-Path Modeling Analysis.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A good understanding of biotic interactions is necessary to accurately predict the vulnerability of ecosystems to climate change. Recently, co-occurrence networks built from environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding data have arisen as a tool to explore interspecific interactions in ecological communities exposed to different human and environmental pressures. Such networks can identify environmentally driven relationships in microbial and eukaryotic communities, but whether inferred co-occurrences robustly represent biotic interactions remains unclear. Here, we tackle this challenge and compare spatio-temporal variability in the structure and complexity of inferred co-occurrence networks and food webs, using 60 eDNA samples covering vertebrates and other eukaryotes in a North Sea coastal ecosystem. We compare topological characteristics and identify highly connected species across spatial and temporal subsets to evaluate variance in community composition and structure. We find consistent trends in topological characteristics across eDNA-derived co-occurrence networks and food webs that support some ability for the co-occurrence networks to detect real ecological processes, despite trophic interactions forming a minority of significant co-occurrences. The lack of significant trophic interactions detected in co-occurrence networks may result from ecological complexities, such as generalist predators having flexible interactions or behavioural partitioning, the inability to distinguish age class with eDNA or co-occurrences being driven by non-trophic or abiotic interactions. We find support for using eDNA-derived co-occurrence networks to infer ecological interactions, but further work is needed to assess their power to reliably detect and differentiate different interaction types and overcome methodological limitations, such as species detection uncertainties, which could influence inferred ecosystem complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.