Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40035283›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2025

A Mini-Fluid Challenge to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Swine.

Kota Yoshida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kota Yoshida

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unnecessary and excessive fluid therapy increases the risk of adverse effects such as pulmonary edema. To prevent this, a mini-fluid challenge (MFC) has been utilized to predict whether fluid therapy will improve circulatory dynamics in human intensive care medicine. The study described here investigated whether MFC is also efficacious in pigs. Thirty-two domestic pigs anesthetized and maintained under mechanical ventilation were treated with successive IV fluid administrations of 2, 1, 1, and 2 mL/kg over a 10-min period for a total dose of 6 mL/kg of Ringer lactate. The percentage increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 2, 3, and 4 mL/kg of cumulative fluid administration was examined to determine whether responders could be identified that would benefit hemodynamically from higher doses of fluids. For the purposes of this study, a 10% increase or more in MAP after 6 mL/kg of fluid administration defined responders, and an increase of less than 10% in MAP was used to define nonresponders. The percentage increase in MAP at 2, 3, and 4 mL/kg fluid administration was evaluated to determine whether this could predict responder status. Eleven of the 32 animals were determined to be responders. Responder status was predicted with high accuracy by the administration of 3 mL/kg (AUC = 0.98) and was moderately predicted with administration of 2 mL/kg (AUC = 0.80), as well as pulse pressure variation (AUC = 0.75). Thus, MFC may be helpful to maintain tissue perfusion in pigs through the use of managed fluid therapy.

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyAnimalsBlood PressureFemaleHemodynamicsMaleRinger's LactateSwineRinger's LactateMAP, mean arterial pressureMFC, mini-fluid challengePPV, pulse pressure variationROC, receiver operating characteristicSVI, stroke volume index

Identifiers

PMID40035283
PMCPMC11808368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.