Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40035282›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2025

Effect of Common Variables on Autoclave Best Practices in Rodent Barrier Programs.

Hannah E Skolnik, Clifford R Roberts, Don R Mabunga, Krista E Lindstrom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannah E Skolnik
Clifford R Roberts
Don R Mabunga
Krista E Lindstrom

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To maintain rodent colonies free from harmful infectious agents, laboratory animal care programs frequently employ the use of sterilized caging and supplies. Sterilized caging is important for preventing the spread of infectious pathogens from contaminated fomites, for biocontainment, and for safety. We designed several experiments to determine the effects of commonly encountered processes on steam penetration and substrate heat exposure. We used biologic indicators as a proxy for steam penetration. We used the time bedding spent above 121 °C as a proxy for substrate cumulative heat exposure. This temperature was measured using a high-temperature data logger. We first examined the effect of stacking cages with various bedding types on steam penetration. We then autoclaved soiled bedding and studied the variables of bedding type, bagging style, presence of diet and water in the cage, and amount of time between cage change out on steam penetration and cumulative heat exposure. For clean bedding, we found adequate steam penetration regardless of bedding type, cycle program, or location of the cage in the bulk autoclave. For the soiled bedding experiments, there were no differences between bedding types noted. Placement of cages inside plastic bagging increased the amount of time the bedding spent above 121 °C on average but not significantly. There was no difference in steam penetration of bedding or time spent above 121 °C for 2- or 4-wk cage change-out schedules. When cages were autoclaved with diet and water, the time the bedding spent above 121 °C was significantly less than when autoclaving bedding alone, but there was adequate steam penetration for all cages. This study demonstrates that common practices in the industry are effective. Based on the results of this study, it is recommended that each institution evaluate their autoclaving practices and confirm that those practices are sufficient and effective.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimals, LaboratoryHousing, AnimalSterilizationAnimalsBedding and LinensHot TemperatureSteamSteamBI, biological indicatorHTLT, high-temperature, low-time cycle programLTHT, low-temperature, high-time cycle programPsia, pounds per square inch absolute

Identifiers

PMID40035282
PMCPMC11808364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.