ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2025
Lipid Nanoparticles and PEG: Time Frame of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Can Be Controlled by Adjusting the Rate of Cellular Uptake of Nanoparticles.
Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatio-temporal targeting of cardiac cells with lipid nanoparticles after myocardial infarction.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2026Article
- Lipid nanoparticle-mediated Cd14 siRNA delivery ameliorates the acute inflammatory response to intracortical microelectrode implantation.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Towards effective cystic fibrosis gene therapy by optimizing prime editing and pulmonary-targeted LNPs.Frontiers in systems biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The engineerability of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and their ability to deliver nucleic acids make LNPs attractive tools for cancer immunotherapy. LNP-based gene delivery can be employed for various approaches in cancer immunotherapy, including encoding tumor-associated antigens and silencing of negative immune checkpoint proteins. For example, LNPs carrying small interfering RNAs can offer several advantages, including sustained and durable inhibition of an immune checkpoint protein. Due to their tunable design, modifying the lipid composition of LNPs can regulate the rate of their uptake by immune cells and the rate of gene silencing. Controlling the kinetics of LNP uptake provides additional flexibility and strategies to generate appropriate immunomodulation in the tumor microenvironment. Here, we evaluated the effects of polyethylene glycol (PEG) content ranging from 0.5 to 6 mol % on the cellular uptake of LNPs by immune cells and gene silencing of PD-L1 after intratumoral administration. We evaluated the cellular uptake and PD-L1 blockade in vitro in cell studies and in vivo using the YUMM1.7 melanoma tumor model. Cell studies showed that the rate of cell uptake was inversely correlated to an increasing mol % of PEG in a linear relationship. In the in vivo studies, 0.5% PEG LNP initiated an immediate effect in the tumor with a significant decrease in the PD-L1 expression of immune cells observed within 24 h. In comparison, the gene silencing effect of 6% PEG LNP was delayed, with a significant decrease of PD-L1 expression in immune cell subsets being observed 72 h after administration. Notably, performance of the 6% PEG LNP at 72 h was comparable to that of the 0.5% PEG LNP at 24 h. Overall, this study suggests that PEG modifications and intratumoral administration of LNPs can be a promising strategy for an effective antitumor immune response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.