Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40035231›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2025

Lipid Nanoparticles and PEG: Time Frame of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Can Be Controlled by Adjusting the Rate of Cellular Uptake of Nanoparticles.

Andrew S Choi, Taylor J Moon, Anubhuti Bhalotia, Aarthi Rajan, Laolu Ogunnaike, Diarmuid W Hutchinson, Inga Hwang, Aaditya Gokhale, Justin N Kim, Timothy Ma and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrew S ChoiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.
Taylor J MoonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.
Anubhuti BhalotiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.
Aarthi RajanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.
Laolu OgunnaikeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.
Diarmuid W HutchinsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.
Inga HwangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.
Aaditya GokhaleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.
Justin N KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.
Timothy MaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.
Efstathios KarathanasisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7484-7552

Funding

TUMOR METABOLISM PROGRAMP30CA043703 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Amar Desai · 1987 to 2026
$142.3M
Interdisciplinary Biomedical Imaging Training ProgramT32EB007509 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID Lynn WILSON, Xin Yu · 2007 to 2026
$5.6M
Targeted immuno-nanoparticles for directing antitumor immune response against breast cancer metastasisR01CA253627 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KARATHANASIS, EFSTATHIOS, SCHIEMANN, WILLIAM · 2020 to 2024
$2.9M
Dual action immunostimulatory nanoparticles for treatment of aggressive cancersR01CA278633 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Efstathios Karathanasis, Li Lily Wang · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA043703NCI NIH HHS R01 CA253627NCI NIH HHS R01 CA278633NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB007509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The engineerability of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and their ability to deliver nucleic acids make LNPs attractive tools for cancer immunotherapy. LNP-based gene delivery can be employed for various approaches in cancer immunotherapy, including encoding tumor-associated antigens and silencing of negative immune checkpoint proteins. For example, LNPs carrying small interfering RNAs can offer several advantages, including sustained and durable inhibition of an immune checkpoint protein. Due to their tunable design, modifying the lipid composition of LNPs can regulate the rate of their uptake by immune cells and the rate of gene silencing. Controlling the kinetics of LNP uptake provides additional flexibility and strategies to generate appropriate immunomodulation in the tumor microenvironment. Here, we evaluated the effects of polyethylene glycol (PEG) content ranging from 0.5 to 6 mol % on the cellular uptake of LNPs by immune cells and gene silencing of PD-L1 after intratumoral administration. We evaluated the cellular uptake and PD-L1 blockade in vitro in cell studies and in vivo using the YUMM1.7 melanoma tumor model. Cell studies showed that the rate of cell uptake was inversely correlated to an increasing mol % of PEG in a linear relationship. In the in vivo studies, 0.5% PEG LNP initiated an immediate effect in the tumor with a significant decrease in the PD-L1 expression of immune cells observed within 24 h. In comparison, the gene silencing effect of 6% PEG LNP was delayed, with a significant decrease of PD-L1 expression in immune cell subsets being observed 72 h after administration. Notably, performance of the 6% PEG LNP at 72 h was comparable to that of the 0.5% PEG LNP at 24 h. Overall, this study suggests that PEG modifications and intratumoral administration of LNPs can be a promising strategy for an effective antitumor immune response.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsLipidsNanoparticlesPolyethylene GlycolsAnimalsB7-H1 AntigenCell Line, TumorFemaleGene SilencingHumansImmunotherapyLiposomesMiceRNA, Small InterferingTumor MicroenvironmentB7-H1 AntigenImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLipid NanoparticlesLipidsLiposomesPolyethylene GlycolsRNA, Small Interferingimmune checkpoint inhibitorlipid nanoparticlesmelanomaPD-L1PEG

Identifiers

PMID40035231
PMCPMC11975481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.