ArticleBirth defects research2025
Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing to Improve Classification of Atrial Septal Defects in Electronic Health Records.
Article in Birth defects research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInternational Classification of Disease (ICD) codes can accurately identify patients with certain congenital heart defects (CHDs). In ICD-defined CHD data sets, the code for secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) is the most common, but it has a low positive predictive value for CHD, potentially resulting in the drawing of erroneous conclusions from such data sets. Methods with reduced false positive rates for CHD among individuals captured with the ASD ICD code are needed for public health surveillance.
methodsWe propose a two-level classification system, which includes a CHD and an ASD classification model, to categorize cases with an ASD ICD code into three groups: ASD, other CHD, or no CHD (including patent foramen ovale). In the proposed approach, a machine learning model that leverages structured data is combined with a text classification system. We compare performances for three text classification strategies: support vector machines (SVMs) using text-based features, a robustly optimized Transformer-based model (RoBERTa), and a scalable tree boosting system using non-text-based features (XGBoost).
resultsUsing SVM for both CHD and ASD resulted in the best performance for the ASD and no CHD group, achieving F
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that it is feasible to use patients' clinical notes and machine learning to perform more fine-grained classification compared to ICD codes, particularly with higher PPV for CHD. The proposed approach can improve CHD surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.