ArticleANZ journal of surgery2025
Experiences of anorectal surgery among gay and bisexual men: a mixed methods study.
Article in ANZ journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe experiences of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) receiving anorectal surgery are not well understood, including their interaction with surgeons and the impact of surgery on receptive anal intercourse. This pilot exploratory study aimed to understand the experiences of GBMSM who recently received anorectal surgery.
methodsThis mixed methods study utilized surveys and semi-structured interviews with gay and bisexual men who received operative treatment by a general or colorectal surgeon for a benign anorectal condition within Australia. Descriptive and qualitative thematic analysis was employed to assess the impact of anorectal surgery and the experience of the surgical encounter.
resultsParticipants reported impaired sexual function and reduced overall well-being after anorectal surgery. They expected surgeons to inquire about their sexual practices and provide additional support and post-operative education, which most often did not occur. Participants perceived their surgeon to lack understanding regarding their sexual orientation and well-being.
conclusionsAnorectal surgery has a significant impact on the sexual and overall well-being of GBMSM. Surgeons should inquire about sexual practices and offer adequate counselling about sexual practices accordingly. Surgeons may require education and training to help improve outcomes for GBMSM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.