Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40035106›Full record

ArticleCurationis2025

The psychosocial implications of cervical cancer in women living in sub-Saharan Africa.

Johanna E Maree, Nokuthula G Nkosi, Agnes A Huiskamp

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Curationis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johanna E MareeDepartment of Nursing Education, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. lize.maree@wits.ac.za.
Nokuthula G Nkosi
Agnes A Huiskamp

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA cervical cancer diagnosis has several implications for women's lives. Living with cervical cancer in the context of sub-Sahara Africa's unique challenges can have a devastating effect on psychosocial health.

objectivesThis study describes the publication output reporting psychosocial implications of cervical cancer for women living in sub-Saharan Africa.

methodA scoping review was conducted using the keywords Africa and cervical cancer in combination with psychosocial, psychological, social, spiritual, cultural and financial to search five databases. A data extraction sheet was developed to capture the relative data, which was analysed using content analysis and descriptive statistics. Of the 294 articles initially identified, 18 were included in the review.

resultsThe majority of the studies (66.7%; n = 12) were qualitative. They focussed on five psychosocial domains - psychological including a lack of knowledge, misunderstanding and unmet information needs, the omnipresent experience of fear and sexual problems as well as social, cultural, spiritual and financial implications.

conclusionWork focussing on the psychosocial implications of cervical cancer in women living in sub-Saharan Africa is limited. Only one study focussed specifically on a psychosocial domain, the rest reported little about psychosocial issues. There is an urgent need for research that focusses exclusively on psychosocial health, separate from other studies.Contribution: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study synthesising research conducted on this specific topic. We mapped the extent of the current evidence base, identified gaps and highlighted areas requiring additional inquiry.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAfrica South of the SaharaFemaleHumanscervical cancernursingpsychosocial implicationsscoping reviewsub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID40035106
PMCPMC11886587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.