ArticleJournal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls2025
Assessing Falls Efficacy in Seniors: Important Insights in Hospital and Community Settings.
Article in Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06903832 (Discharge Recommendations for Older Adults Using Physical Outcome Measure), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Discharge Recommendations for Older Adults Using Physical Outcome Measure (DROP)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reliability and validity of the balance recovery confidence scale in persons with stroke.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Falls efficacy is an important psychological construct in falls prevention and management. It refers to an individual's perceived physical ability to prevent and manage falls. Despite its significance, falls efficacy remains under-researched. This article highlights three findings to encourage clinical practitioners to integrate falls efficacy assessments into practice for hospitalised and community-dwelling seniors. Hospitalised seniors face reduced mobility and deconditioning, significantly lowering falls efficacy. Conversely, community-dwelling seniors exhibit higher falls efficacy due to greater functioning levels and independence, though some may lack the physical capacity to mitigate falls. Differentiating between domains of falls efficacy is crucial, as confidence expressed by individuals in their specific physical abilities may vary. Seniors displaying discordance between their confidence and actual falls risk may be more vulnerable to falls. Our analysis reveals that 45% of hospitalised seniors and 19% of community-dwelling seniors exhibited such discordance. Incorporating falls efficacy assessments into clinical practice can help identify at-risk individuals, enable personalised interventions, and facilitate safer transitions post-discharge. Understanding the interplay between psychological and physical dimensions of falls risk is essential for improving older adults' quality of life and independence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.