ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Bibliometric analysis of the Top 1000 most-cited articles in otolaryngology over the past decade: global research trends and hotspots.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global research trends and knowledge gaps in chronic pharyngitis: A bibliometric analysis (2007-2025).European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Review
- Three Decades of Research Trends in Rhinology: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal of Rhinology.Journal of rhinology : official journal of the Korean Rhinologic Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The field of otolaryngology has achieved remarkable progress over the past decade due to technological advancements and interdisciplinary integration. Understanding research trends and hotspots is essential to drive further innovation and development. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted on Web of Science on November 22, 2024, to identify the top 1,000 most-cited otolaryngology publications from 2014 to 2024. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism v8.0.2, CiteSpace (6.2.4R), and VOSviewer (1.6.18) to visualize trends and research networks. Results: The annual publication volume in otolaryngology decreased after 2014, with the United States dominating in both publication count and citation frequency. Influential journals and prominent authors were identified, and research areas expanded beyond traditional clinical management to interdisciplinary fields. Chronic rhinosinusitis, olfactory dysfunction, and machine learning emerged as key research hotspots. Conclusion: Otolaryngology has made significant progress across multiple domains. Future research should focus on integrating artificial intelligence into clinical practice, fostering interdisciplinary collaborations, and advancing precision medicine and translational research. These efforts will be critical for addressing emerging challenges and capitalizing on new opportunities in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.