ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
A study on the therapeutic effect of precise clipping of intracranial aneurysms assisted by CTA and 3D-slicer software.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the application of Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) combined with 3D-Slicer software reconstruction technology in the diagnosis and preoperative planning of intracranial aneurysms, and to explore its positive significance in improving surgical outcomes for patients. Methods: From January 2021 to December 2023, a total of 24 patients diagnosed with intracranial aneurysms (25 cases) underwent craniotomy clipping surgery. We utilized 3D-Slicer to render and fuse preoperative CTA image data, and to formulate individualized surgical plans, including approach, bone window, anticipated protection of the aneurysm-bearing artery and perforating arteries, and compared these with the actual surgical procedures. The actual intraoperative conditions were used as the diagnostic reference standard to compare and analyze the morphology of intracranial aneurysms, assessing the consistency between preoperative planning and actual operations. Additionally, intraoperative and postoperative complications and prognosis were analyzed. Results: It was confirmed that among the 25 intracranial aneurysms, the combination of CTA and 3D-Slicer could effectively detect and reconstruct these aneurysms; quantifying the extent of bone window grinding could reduce the need for multiple bone grinding after opening the dura mater; the consistency in determining the stenosis of the aneurysm-bearing artery intraoperatively, the difficulty of reconstructing and separating the aneurysm neck, and the condition of the perforating arteries near the aneurysm was good, with Kappa values of 0.865, 0.779, and 0.635, respectively. However, the consistency in predicting the rupture orientation of the aneurysm was poor, with a Kappa value of 0.186. All aneurysms in this group were completely clipped, and no new signs of bleeding were found in the head CT within 24 h after surgery, and no signs of aneurysm recurrence were observed in the head CTA within 7 days. Conclusion: In summary, combining 3D-Slicer technology with CTA can accurately assess intracranial aneurysms and provide key anatomical information required for craniotomy clipping surgery to formulate surgical plans, which has a positive significance in reducing surgical complications. These findings not only lay the foundation for further exploration of related issues but also provide clinical doctors with more scientifically effective guidance for diagnosis and surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.