Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40035039›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Using machine learning to identify frequent attendance at accident and emergency services in Lanarkshire.

Fergus Reid, S Josephine Pravinkumar, Roma Maguire, Ashleigh Main, Haruno McCartney, Lewis Winters, Feng Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fergus ReidComputer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1894-6316
S Josephine PravinkumarNHS Lanarkshire, Bothwell, South Lanarkshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4140-1209
Roma MaguireComputer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7935-3447
Ashleigh MainComputer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4639-7486
Haruno McCartneyComputer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1740-3078
Lewis WintersComputer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6032-1412
Feng DongComputer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4122-8012

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Frequent attenders to accident and emergency (A&E) services pose complex challenges for healthcare providers, often driven by critical clinical needs. Machine learning (ML) offers potential for predictive approaches to managing frequent attendance, yet its application in this area is limited. Existing studies often focus on specific populations or models, raising concerns about generalisability. Identifying risk factors for frequent attendance and high resource use is crucial for effective prevention strategies. Objectives: This research aims to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of ML approaches in predicting frequent A&E attendance in NHS Lanarkshire, Scotland, identify associated risk factors and compare findings with existing research to uncover commonalities and differences. Method: Health and social care data were collected from 17,437 A&E patients in NHS Lanarkshire (2021-2022), including clinical, social and demographic information. Five classification models were tested: multinomial logistic regression (LR), random forests (RF), support vector machine (SVM) classifier, k-nearest neighbours (k-NN) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) classifier. Models were evaluated using a confusion matrix and metrics such as precision, recall, F1 and area under the curve. Shapley values were used to identify risk factors. Results: MLP achieved the highest F1 score (0.75), followed by k-NN, RF and SVM (0.72 each), and LR (0.70). Key health conditions and risk factors consistently predicted frequent attendance across models, with some variation highlighting dataset-specific characteristics. Conclusions: This study underscores the utility of combining ML models to enhance prediction accuracy and identify risk factors. Findings align with existing research but reveal unique insights specific to the dataset and methodology.

Indexed as

accident and emergencyFrequent attendancemachine learningpublic healthrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40035039
PMCPMC11873922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.