ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Development and validation of a predictive model for the risk of symptomatic adjacent segmental degeneration after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Treatment and prognosis of spinal cord reperfusion injury after cervical spinal canal stenosis surgery: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To investigate the risk factors for symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) 5 years after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and develop and evaluate predictive models. Methods: A total of 655 patients who underwent ACDF were randomly assigned to the training set ( Results: LASSO regression combined with logistic regression analysis revealed that age, cervical canal stenosis, smaller T1S and smaller cervical lordosis (CL) were risk factors for ASD 5 years after surgery. Nomographic analysis using appeal factors was used to predict the risk of ASD. The area under the ROC curve was 0.711 (95% CI: 0.643-0.780) in the training set and 0.701 (95% CI: 0.618-0.785) in the validation set. The calibration curve showed no significant bias in either set. The DCA indicated that using the nomogram to predict the risk of ASD would be more accurate when the risk threshold probability was 12-53% in the training set and 6-43% in the validation set. Conclusion: Age, cervical spinal stenosis, a smaller T1S, and a smaller CL are independent risk factors for ASD 5 years after ACDF surgery. Based on these four indicators, we constructed a new clinical prediction model that has a certain predictive effect and is conducive to clinical decision-making and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.