ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Comprehensive Needs Assessment for Enhancing Self-Management in People with Lipoedema and the Support Provided by Their Healthcare Professionals.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Lipedema: Progress, Challenges, and the Road Ahead.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025Pooled it
- Development of an Evidence-Based and Theory-Informed Self-Management Intervention for People with Lipoedema: An Intervention Mapping Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The cause of lipoedema remains unclear, and the condition is currently incurable. Effective self-management is therefore essential for coping with its physical and psychological impacts and the necessary lifestyle adjustments. This study aimed to assess the needs, barriers, and facilitators for enhancing self-management and self-management support from the perspectives of people with lipoedema and the healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in their care. Methods: The study used a mixed-methods approach, incorporating a narrative review focused on people with chronic conditions and their HCPs, along with focus groups involving people diagnosed with lipoedema and the HCPs involved in their care. The Core Processes of the Intervention Mapping method guided a systematic approach to address the study's objectives. Qualitative data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Results: Findings revealed unique self-management barriers for people with lipoedema, including limited awareness and expertise among HCPs, as well as stigmatization from both HCPs and society. Participants identified a need for tailored lifestyle plans, guidance, and support for monitoring progress. Key facilitators included self-management skills, supportive networks, and role models. HCPs noted barriers in communication and collaboration due to a lack of specialized professionals and negative attitudes toward lipoedema. They expressed a need for multidisciplinary/interprofessional teams, accurate diagnosis, patient openness, and reliable information resources. Facilitators included fostering trust, encouraging patient participation, and setting achievable goals. Conclusion: This study underscores the need for tailored self-management interventions for people with lipoedema. The adaptation of existing self-management strategies from other chronic conditions should take into account the specific needs, barriers, and facilitators of people with lipoedema and their HCPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.