ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis
Third Liver Resection for Re-recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Assessment of the Prognostic Factors of Long-term Survival.
Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognosis Using Modified Albumin-Bilirubin Grade in Resected Biliary Tract Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-matched Analysis.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aim: Second hepatic resection is a well-established and effective treatment for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite this, the recurrence rate of HCC remains high. The efficacy of third liver resection for re-recurrent HCC is uncertain, and prognostic factors affecting survival after third hepatectomy have not been comprehensively evaluated. This study aimed to investigate the short- and long-term outcomes of third liver resection for re-recurrent HCC and identify prognostic factors affecting survival. Patients and Methods: In total, 27 patients who underwent three liver resections for primary, recurrent, and re-recurrent HCC were retrospectively reviewed. The prognostic factors of long-term survival were evaluated using clinical data including those of previous liver resections. Results: No cases of perioperative mortality after third liver resection for re-recurrent HCC were found. The median overall survival and disease-free survival were 38.3 and 5.8 months, respectively. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 56.8% and 10.9%, respectively. Clinical parameters such as tumor marker level, primary tumor size, and surgical interval of the third liver resection and of the first and second surgeries were significantly associated with long-term survival. Conclusion: The survival rate of third liver resection for re-recurrent HCC in our study was similar to that reported for second and third hepatectomies in previous studies. Clinical information on previous surgeries could be a useful determinant of third liver resection for re-recurrent HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.