ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis
Predictive Factors for the Efficacy of Head and Neck Photoimmunotherapy and Optimization of Treatment Schedules.
Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aim: Head and neck photoimmunotherapy (HN-PIT) is a promising treatment for unresectable locally advanced or recurrent head and neck cancers. However, the optimal tumor characteristics and treatment schedules remain unclear. This study aimed to identify factors associated with treatment efficacy and assess the effectiveness of treatment schedules. Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients treated with HN-PIT at Aichi Cancer Center Hospital from January 2021 to October 2024 was conducted. Tumor characteristics, treatment cycles, and outcomes were analyzed. The thickness and longest diameter of the tumors were evaluated, and treatment intervals were assessed for their association with complete response (CR). Results: Among the 19 patients (30 cycles), CR was observed exclusively in local lesions. Smaller and thinner lesions showed significantly better treatment responses. Thinner lesions were more likely to achieve CR after a single cycle, whereas intermediate-thickness tumors often required multiple cycles with shorter intervals. The regional lesions did not achieve CR, even with multiple cycles and shorter intervals. Age was a significant factor influencing CR. Conclusion: HN-PIT demonstrated promising efficacy for local lesions, particularly for smaller and thinner lesions. Optimizing treatment schedules, including shorter intervals for intermediate lesions, is critical for improving outcomes. Further research is needed to enhance the efficacy for regional lesions and refine treatment schedules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.